Skip to content

So-called ‘terrorists’ finally receive a democratic platform – as an art project

The setting for the New World Summit in Berlin's Sophiensaele. The flags are all of organizations on the 'designated terrorist lists'. Showing one of them might be a crime, but as a whole they qualify as an artwork. All photos courtesy of Jonas Staal and his team

I chaired a summit and helped curate a project designed by the Dutch artist Jonas Staal in Berlin on 4 and 5 May, as part of the Berlin Biennial.

The New World Summit is the latest step in the artist’s decade-long research into art and politics, and particularly the true nature of democracy. He invited senior representatives of organizations on the so called ‘designated terrorist lists’ to participate in a 2-day long open forum with the audience, thereby questioning the logic of democratic exclusion. Put simply: how can a democratic system systematically exclude population groups from democratic participation, if the principle of democracy is precisely to include all sectors of society in a public debate? What does this say about the political system currently called democracy?

The artist Jonas Staal opening Day 2 of the New World Summit

The project was also guided by simple curiosity about those organizations that are excluded. It turns out to be difficult to hear their own voice; when googling the organizations one only finds the voices of those that oppose and exclude these so called ‘terrorist’ organizations. Therefore both the website and day 1 of the proceedings were dedicated to letting these organizations speak freely, without interruption, about their organization, their struggle, and the consequences of being excluded from peaceful political participation through the mechanism of ‘terrorist’ designation.
Participants included

Moussa Ag Assarid, EU representative of the MNLA (Mouvement National pour la Liberation de l'Azawad)

Fadile Yildirim (on the right) from the Kurdish Women's Movement, spent ten years in a Turkish prison as member of the PKK

Luis Jalandoni, chief negatiator for the National Democratic Front of the Philippines, including the Communist Party and the New People's Army

Victor Koppe, lawyer of among others the LTTE (Tamil Tigers) about his efforts to get them removed from the EU list of terrorist organizations

Linda Moreno, lawyer for among others Sami al Arian, accused of terrorism under the US Patriot Act

Other participants were Nancy Hollander, who defends several Guantanamo Bay prisoners and Jon Andoni Lekue, now negotiating for the Basque Peace Process which includes the banned groups ETA and Batasuna. Note that the MNLA is not (yet) placed on the terrorist list, but it seems to be heading there.

Interestingly, attempts to engage ‘terrorist organizations’ in dialogue by think-tanks, academic institutions and political organizations have all failed up to date. The sponsors of the Berlin Biennial also threatened with withdrawing their support but were ultimately convinced that the project was not ‘pro-terrorist’. There were difficult negotations between the artist and the sponsors but ultimately, it appears that art can go where politics and academia cannot go; art is a realm where fundamental political discussions can still take place.

This, I think, is an extremely interesting first conclusion. The question arises why such politics cannot be discussed freely in the political realm? We know the answer: because ‘speaking to terrorists’ is a form of legitimation and that is a moral no-go area in current politics. But of course that is an insufficient argumentation, especially because the exclusion from the political debate, invariably accompanied by repressive measures using the state’s military and juridical apparatus, pushes organizations to clandestinity and propitiates violence.

From the accounts of the speakers one tendency became clear: when armed organizations agree to stop violence in order to engage the state in a dialogue the state often uses the recourse to designing them as terrorist organizations in order to force them to capitulate (or to return to the armed struggle). This happened to the Filipino communists and their New People’s Army, to the Tamil Tigers, to the Basques and to other organizations that were not present.

One may tentatively conclude that in these cases the state rather faces a violent adversary than a democratic one, which can publicly and freely challenge the state. Maybe the current democratic deficit of the international community of states can only be masked by keeping alive the ‘terrorist’ nemesis. In any case we have all been witness to how civil liberties and democratic principles have been rolled back since 2001 in order to allow the ‘democratic’ states of the world to engage freely in the ‘War on Terror’.

On day 2 the audience, which included lawyers, political analysts, journalists, artists and activists could freely engage the political and legal representatives of the ‘terrorist’ organizations in debate. The high level of the discussions and the originality of many of the statements put forward by the speakers and the audience – some of which can be found here - were testimony to the need to continue such a democratic engagement in open dialogue with organizations currently excluded from democracy.

This experiment needs to be continued – and eventually be brought back to the sphere of democratic politics. As long as that’s impossible artists will have to fill the gap. What a strange situation.

Me chairing the summit. All photos courtesy of Jonas Staal and his team

Categories: Art & Politics, Political thoughts.

Tags: , , , , ,

A visit to the National Museum of Riyadh

The National Museum of Riyadh is a very interesting museum designed by the Canadian architect Raymond Moriyama (figs 1 & 2). It was inaugurated in 1999. It is located on the grounds of the Murabba Palace that was built by King Abdul Aziz in 1936/37 north of what was then Riyadh, a small and congested walled city. Many of the buildings of this palatial complex that fell into disuse in the early 1950s have been beautifully restored, and together with the gardens that surround them they form one of the only large public spaces in Riyadh (figs 3 & 4). Many people come here to stroll, picnic and watch other passers-by.

The collection has several highlights. The first part, ‘Man and the Universe’, attempts to bring together natural history and the Quran (fig 5). Next to the impressive multi-media displays one will find the relevant surahs (figs 6 & 7). Unlike creationist museums in the USA there is no conflict between the results of scientific discovery and religious tenets. When they do not collude, the scientific point of view is stated blithely after surah, allowing the reader to attempt to reconcile them. One finds references to the Quran in many other parts of the museum, sometimes even to justify the general interest in non-Islamic subjects (fig 8).

The standing stones show that parts of the Arabian peninsula were settled long ago (figs 9 & 10). The figures and pictograms on them are evidence of a graphic tradition in the peninsula that leads straight from the 4th millenium BC to the current rage of Louis Vuitton handbags.

It is interesting to see how the jahiliyya period (the ‘era of ignorance’ before the advent of Islam) is treated. I was surprised by the open-minded, scientific and non-doctrinary approach followed in the museum, in starked contrast to the manner in which public life in Riyadh is generally organized. There is no attempt to disparage the idol worshippers; to the contrary, the segment dedicated to the excavations at Qaryat al Faw, including a small temple (fig 12) are very informative. Some interesting multi-media displays project the visitor into ancient village life, before the Islam. The treasure excavated at Thaj in the Eastern Province (fig 13) is another example of the relative refinement of pre-Islamic Saudi culture.

Some informative maps trace the tribal movements, trade routes and commercial activity in the Arabian peninsula around the time of the prophet Mohammed’s birth (figs 14 & 15). Then comes a sensory experience in which the visitor goes through a dark corridor with movement-triggered audio track accompanied by flashes, to impress him/her with the terrible period of ignorance and conflict that preceded the rise of Islam. This brings you to the second part of the museum, dedicated to the history of Islam in the Arabian peninsula (quite meagre) and the first and second Saudi kingdoms thwarted by the Ottomans. This section, as well as the next about the unification of Saudi Arabia in the first decades of the 20th century, is much more ideologically slanted. The Asiris, Hejazis and Shia of the Eastern province might object against the manner in which these historical events are presented. The official history of the unification of the Kingdom, for those who have no patience to read all the texts accompanying the displays, is projected in a movie theatre that can seat more than hundred people at once.

A final section is about Mecca and the Hajj. It includes scale models of the city and the mosque (figs 16 & 17), and a lot of photographs documenting the experience of the Hajj throughout the 20th century. However tired you may be after visiting all the other rooms of the museum, this part commands your attention once again. The photograph of the Ka’aba standing as the tallest building in a low-rise city, with old houses climbing the hillsides (fig 18), is a powerful reminder of how Mecca used to be before the commercial high-rise developments in the city took off.

All together the visit of museum and the surrounding area was my most pleasurable experience of Riyadh. Two caveats for prospective visitors: call the museum before visiting to make sure it is accessible (there are family hours and frequent holidays); and I could find nothing to eat or drink on the grounds, despite several cafetarias being advertised on the floorplans in and around the museum.

Categories: Art & Politics, Exhibition review.

Tags: , , ,

My most recent book is now online

‘I am Anything, I am Everything’ is a book/catalogue I wrote on the recent work of Saudi artist Ayman Yossri Daydban for the Athr Gallery in Jeddah. The book is fully online here next to two other books I’ve published on Issuu.

Enjoy the read!

Categories: Announcement.

Tags: , , ,

Jeddah about its own art scene


This is part of a catalogue I wrote to accompany the new solo show by Ayman Yossri Daydban at Athr Gallery. The book was launched yesterday

Voices from Jeddah
Discussion of the Saudi Art Scene today

The following discussions were held mid December 2011 in Jeddah. The participants included Ayman Yossri Daydban, other artists, collectors and other people strongly involved in the art scene. The Athr Gallery convened three meetings, in the gallery and in the artist’s studio, which were moderated by the author. Besides, the author held many one-on-one conversations during his research visit. The transcripts of the meetings and the notes taken by the author were edited and rearranged according to the themes touched upon.
Artists are indicated by ‘A’, while ‘G’ stands for all the other guests. The sections between [brackets] have been added by the author for clarification.

1 – Regional Context
A: A renaissance is happening in the region. The revolutions taking place are not simply political; I believe they are revolutions of expression. Art is a means of expression that isn’t governed by the constraints imposed on our traditional ways of self-expression.
G: Art is for us a new method of communication for depicting reality across cultural boundaries. It can be used to counter the stereotypical image of Saudi Arabia and the Muslim world in general that is generated by the global media. This was the only source of information available to people around the world. But now we also have art.
G: I think the timing for the emergence of the Saudi art scene couldn’t have been more perfect: the spotlight is right on us. Many people wonder what is happening in this country.
A: People abroad would not believe that someone like me exists [a female Saudi movie director], or that there are other, internationally successful, artists in Saudi Arabia. In the West, there is only one image of the Saudi: as the terrorist.
G: There is a difference between the art we see emerging in Saudi Arabia now and that made by Middle Eastern artists living in the West. The latter mainly address a Western audience, sometimes reproducing stereotypes, while artists here express the Saudi environment. What’s interesting is to see that you now see local Middle Eastern artists such as Ayman [Yossri Daydban] on the international art scene.
G: These Saudi artists don’t offer the West what it wants to see.
G: Most Saudi artists do not have a classical art education. They are creative people trying to express themselves, to express an idea or a feeling through a novel medium, and they discovered that the best medium for this is art. That makes the Saudi art scene conceptually very strong, because the artists are trying to invent a new language for expressing themselves, despite all the constraints.
G: Saudi Arabia is not a colonized country that was influenced by the colonizing country’s art. That gives Saudi art its genuine nature.
G: And Saudi culture is one. Other Arab cultures are a melting pot. I can see this in Lebanese culture for example. This makes Saudi art unique.
G: For ages, Cairo, Baghdad and Damascus were the leading cities of the Arab art world, but now this position seems to be shifting to the Gulf.
G: What is happening in the Gulf art world is very interesting. It’s moving at a fast forward pace, but it’s not based on strong fundamentals – at least the contemporary art scenes in some cities of the region. There you find interesting initiatives for supporting the arts and a lot of galleries, but very few good local artists. The question is whether it’s possible to build an art scene top-down.
G: But now Abu Dhabi has the Louvre and the Guggenheim, instead of only having a Ferrari world. This gives credibility to artists and art generally; it recognizes their social role. OK, you cannot buy culture; you cannot create culture with money. But you can build institutions that become platforms for artists to express themselves and experiment. Artists, not only in the Gulf but in the whole Arab world, need these platforms. Where else do you find them?
G: The Gulf countries have created a market for countries in the region where the local artistic scene has been developed bottom-up; they complement each other.
G: Without the development of the art market in the Gulf, the Saudi art scene would not have developed, at least not in the way it is doing now.

2: Jeddah
G: Within the Gulf Region, there are two or three areas where culture has developed steadily throughout the ages. The Hijaz, Asir, and probably Yemen: in short, the West coast of the Arabian Peninsula. [This is admittedly a biased local view. You could add, for example, Bahrain and Muscat to this list]
A: Jeddah and Mecca have been cosmopolitan cities since the beginning of the Islamic age, because of the Hajj. If you look at the population of these two cities, you see many Saudis with ancestors from all over the Islamic world: from Sudan to Turkmenistan. This has made the people of the Hijaz relatively receptive and creative.
A: There is also a Sufi tradition in the Hijaz and the Asir, which makes people here more open to art than in other parts of the country.
G: The people of the Nejd and Riyadh have a solid cultural tradition too.
G: That is a tribal culture. They have no tradition in visual arts. You can see the difference between the art scenes in Riyadh and Jeddah: Jeddah is more visual arts-based.
G: And Riyadh has a more intellectual and literate scene.
G: The cultural background of the Saudi West coast is essential for the development of its artistic scene. There is no such fertile soil in the Center and East of Saudi Arabia. What can you tap into over there? From what can you create? You can’t fast-track all that and just develop something and call it “contemporary” without going through certain phases. It just has to take more time. This is also true for other countries in the region.
A: There is not much to inspire an artist in Jeddah, either in terms of aesthetics or of social situations. Maybe this is because the urban explosion of Jeddah – and other Saudi cities – coincided with a regressive, anti-art period in the 1980s and 90s.
G: The sculpture park along the Corniche [with works by Moore, Miró, Cesar and other international artists] may have been an element of inspiration for local artists.
A: I used to play there, we would climb on the sculptures. But we didn’t think of them as ‘art’. We would go there because it was one of the few public spaces in the city. I don’t know if it inspired me. Maybe at an unconscious level.
G: There was no information about those sculptures, nor about the artists: not even their names. They only stood there to beautify the city, not to give the public an art education.

3 – Current Dynamics
G: The 1970s were essential for the development of the Saudi art scene. It was our first contact with the rest of the world.
A: There was even an art college in Riyadh then, you could become a professional artist. I was lucky enough to attend it. Then, from the early 1980s onward, we went through two decades where society was isolated. Whereas the essence of art is to develop your own voice. Even throughout that period, art did not disappear. It just isolated itself in different cells.
G: Those that continued practicing arts, like Ayman [Yossri Daydban], were brave.
G: From the late 1990s, Saudi Arabia was hit by the communication revolution. Internet and satellite television opened up the country. Nowadays, whatever is happening abroad is retransmitted here.
A: Global consumer society invaded our private lives through TV and internet, the malls, the fast-food chains etc. Just like the rest of Saudi society, I welcomed this change because it provided a relief from the strict society in which we grew up, cut off from the rest of the world. But now I wonder if we’re not the victim of an imposed ideology like before, only it’s not Saudi, it’s global.
G: At least art is accepted as part of the global consumer society. When I drive down the streets I see more and more art galleries. I stop to look what’s happening inside. I pretend I want to buy something and then the people running these places, often artists themselves, start talking to me with love about the art they display. People are more conscious about art now, they cherish the idea of being an artist.
G: Even the national and local TV stations have started discussing art, inviting artists to speak about their work.
G: One of the reasons we appreciate art is because it is light, it is fresh, it is an escape from the pressure of our society. The art community today is very small, but at least it is there.
G: There is room for growth. The Saudi art scene is an open field; you can shape it in whatever way you want to; this sense of promise or opportunity drives many people.
G: A more general thirst for culture exists in our society. There was a conference for architectural heritage in the Red Sea Mall. Traditional craftsmen from different parts of the country were invited to build their houses in the traditional style – inside the mall – and there was a photographic exhibition. It was a great success.
G: The malls have become the main public space for most people. They are the places with most foot traffic, where people can meet freely.

4 – Social Determinants
G: Saudis are brought up to perceive things in a determined way. There is no freedom of interpretation. Take this glass for example: abroad it could be anything, you could put rocks in it to make it into a musical instrument. Here the perception is very limited: it is only a glass. This limits the receptivity of people to abstract art. Take Ayman’s recent flags: here most people will see them as old metal, and that belongs in a junkyard. They will not search for its different meanings.
A: The strong egalitarianism in our society may also have a downside. It discourages individualism, while the strong need for individual creative expression is the basis of art.
G: Religion comes into play as soon as you start drawing or making something. Are you idolizing it or trying to prolong its life: what are you trying to do? So the question goes back to what art is, and what it is supposed to be.
G: In other Arab countries people are surrounded by art, and have learnt how to relate to it. But not here.
G: Social conservatism also plays a role. There are people who will not want the artist to even hint at anything that is against their sense of how matters ought to be portrayed.
A: These people receive a lot of popular support. Twitter gives a good indication. A conservative sheikh may have up to 400.000 followers, but the liberal opinion-makers will have a few thousand at most.

Art Education
A: In our schoolbooks, a line would be drawn across the neck of human figures, to indicate that their soul had departed and that they were not representations of living beings. I think that’s where the expression ‘red lines’ came from.
A: In school, we were not even allowed to draw a face or a human figure; now that has changed, but not completely.
G: Art education was not available when I grew up here; even now, I cannot find a class to take, maybe they are more available to women than to men.
G: But there is a demand for it. When I started taking art classes in Jeddah ten years ago, women would come all the way from Mecca or Ta’if. I believe that frustration fired these girls. They came to art because they needed a place to express their dreams.
G: Nowadays some private universities have classes such as art appreciation or art history.
A: What’s needed is visual education in all fields, not only in art. Children should be taught how to look critically, discern and think for themselves. We should start with museums of science, history and anthropology, not with contemporary art. This will provide the references and the basis for truly understanding art.
G: Visual education should include an appreciation of our cultural heritage. You cannot understand the present without understanding the past.
G: For some reason, even calligraphy or geometric art are not taught in our schools, although they are part of our culture.

6 – Red Lines
G: We now have more freedom of expression then we used to. This encourages artistic creation.
G: The art scene is still limited to a relatively small group. We don’t know what would happen if the masses would gain access to this art scene.
G: Let’s face it, there is still a lot of censorship in our society
G: But there’s no turning back the wheel now. The red lines of yesteryear have been passed. Where would the new red lines be drawn?
G: The seed has been planted. Some steps may be taken back, but you cannot turn the whole clock back… just delay further development.
G: For now, the censorship is becoming more and more lenient. The government is becoming more flexible.
G: The artists can learn to leap over the barriers limiting their artistic expression, instead of being blocked by them.
G: I feel that the red lines imposed by society are part of the strength of Saudi art. Living somewhere with restrictions can challenge an artist in a very positive sense. It forces him to be extra clever and creative in the execution of his ideas, and, above all, subtle. The result is almost a kind of refinement rather than works that are loud and explosive. Smaller steps are always better than giant leaps, because they go unnoticed. Giant leaps cause giant backlashes, which can be counterproductive. The smaller steps are the ones that are here to stay.
A: As an artist, you try to provoke people in a delicate manner. You want to wake them up, but not turn them away from you.
A: From my experience in the art scene, I notice that censorship usually doesn’t have this positive impact. Most artists do not dare reveal the truth of their thoughts. Even when we heard that we artists should freely express ourselves, an internal censor was turned on because we thought that this was a trap. The artist had lost his capacity for expressing himself freely. Only artists who dare express their opinions find creative ways of dealing with the red lines in our society.

7 – The Shabab (youth)
G: Sixty percent of the population is under thirty; this generation lives differently from the way we lived; they are developing their own values.
G: The new generation has to figure out a way of dealing with the world that we, the older generation, have constructed. And not only in Saudi Arabia. This is a challenge for the young all over the world. The new generation is discovering its own voice, and is finding out that it is a communications tool that can impact reality – not only virtual reality.
A: The new generation of artists has matured during a very suitable period, historically, because it coincided with the opening up of the country by King Abdullah. We – I consider myself member of the older generation – fought the young artists at the beginning, we used to deal with them condescendingly. But they went their own way, and started developing new art forms in a cultural, real and deeply felt manner. Then we started learning from them – at least I did.
G: The ambitiousness of many of the young artists and their ability to absorb are astonishing.
G: Exposure to TV, color, vibrancy and movement has changed the new generation’s aesthetic values.
G: The new generation of artists is experimenting with new media and novel shapes and forms. We are going to see a kind of art we haven’t seen before.
G : New media are really big, especially photography. There seem to be hundreds of photographers showing their work in the malls. Recently, I was a panel member on a jury for a photographic competition. We received more than 400 entries!

8 – Shortcomings
G : We need more exhibition space, places to see art. Jeddah, a city of nearly four million people, does not have any exhibition halls, no contemporary art museums, and only one good gallery: Athr. This is the only place one can go to if one wants to see good contemporary art.
G: The artist can only play a social role if his work is accessible to the masses. He needs a platform. Today some platforms are emerging, for example, the international tour of Edge of Arabia and the virtual museum BASMOCA [Edge of Arabia is a traveling exhibition of contemporary Saudi art. Following its launch in London in 2008 it has traveled to Riyadh, Berlin, Istanbul, Dubai and Venice (during the Venice Biennial). Edge of Arabia Jeddah, its next appearance, will open on 19 Jan 2012, one day before the solo show of Ayman Yossri Daydban in Athr Gallery. For Basmoca see below].
G: There needs to be a space where artists can interact with each other, where they can discuss their work and comment on each other. The nucleus of an art community.
A: The most important thing for me as an artist is to have a safe place; to have support, your studio, your temple, your shrine where you continue to create, no matter whether people see it or not.
G: Artists need exposure, they need to be pushed.
G: What is most sorely missing is good art criticism.
G: What we really need in this country is a non-profit sector. You don’t have grants for artists or residency programs here; we look for them in Europe. We need a non-profit art movement, whether supported by the government or the private sector or both.
G: There is al Mansouria Foundation, established by Princess Jawaher and Mona Khazindar, who is now the director of the Institut du Monde Arabe in Paris. It has a good collection of modern and contemporary Saudi art. It is a non-profit organization that offers residencies in Paris. This is an example that needs to be followed.
G: We also need to open communication channels for the art world. I feel there is a lack of communication between the artists and within the art scene. One of us mentioned an exhibition in the Red Sea Mall. I hadn’t heard about it and wonder where I could have found out about it.

9 – Policy
G: The government could offer opportunities for art education, and provide platforms that facilitate artistic expression and discussion. Provide an art infrastructure. Beyond that, I recommend that the government does not get involved.
G: We must keep in mind that Saudi Arabia is a very young country. We are less than 100 years old. There was nothing. A total desert. We needed to create schools, universities, roads… we had other priorities.
G: The government has no rules and regulations to deal with art. Specific policies should be developed to deal with the art sector.
A: The government should support art in general by acknowledging its impact on the general social climate. It should create opportunities and spaces for artists and allow the emergence of organizations that support the arts.
G: At a policy level, the government could encourage private-sector initiatives. Like providing tax cuts and other incentives for stimulating private-sector investments in the public art sphere. Because there are many ideas and solutions for developing the art scene in the private sector.
G: In many places in the world, there are old warehouses that have been converted into studio and exhibition spaces where artists and their visitors can meet, exchange ideas and comment on each other.
G: There was an initiative in the old town to create an artists’ space. I don’t know if it’s going to happen. This would be the kind of government action that we need.
A: There was a place like that, the Al Miftaha arts village near Abha, which was sponsored by King Faisal. It was a great place where some of the most famous Saudi artists today matured. But now it is about to close for lack of funding.
G: One of the issues dogging the development of an art scene in this country is bad management. Many good initiatives did not receive proper follow-up because of shortcomings in the management.
G: One project in the old town that led to an exhibition of twenty painters, for example only occurred once, after that nothing happened. We do not have any recurring events that we can look forward to.
G: The Saudi Pavilion at the Venice Biennale was a great exhibition, but there are no plans to show it in Saudi Arabia. Where could that happen anyway? We have no exhibition spaces.

10 – Private sector
G: Our parents’ generation would buy antiques, we buy art.
G: Just collecting and sharing the collection is already a big step. More and more people are doing that. This is in large part thanks to Athr Gallery. It has changed the geography of art in Jeddah because it presents art in a proper way. Everyone wants to be part of that because it is something to be proud of. Before, collecting was different, it was private. Now it has become a more open scene. The situation is becoming more relaxed, we buy art, our friends buy art, we discuss it. It is becoming a language.
G: One still doesn’t show the more controversial artworks in the public spaces of the house, though.
G: We also play a role for artists: we act as critics and give them advice. Since many of us travel a lot, visit art fairs and speak to other artists and gallery owners, we have an access to the art world that they can use.
G: I started the BASMOCA virtual museum as a private initiative. It follows a new approach to breaking barriers by using technology. It can be visited online. This was a way of responding to people who criticize the building of museum structures that do not attract enough visitors. It was also an initiative for representing our country – in second life. This was a small initiative to show locals and international people that we have a cultural vision, even though we face many challenges. To show that there is nothing wrong with visiting a museum. I am trying to provide a public service with private means.
G: In Athr Gallery, we have educational programs and exhibitions. Besides the real art lovers, we have newcomers who want to learn, and incidental visitors interested in discovering what art is about. Some of them get hooked. Even if they came only once it counts for us, because this is what we are trying to give to society. We hope that other art spaces will emerge for introducing art to a broader public. Not only by displaying artworks in big rooms, but by providing a place to work and develop in, a place you want to be part of.

Categories: Uncategorized.

Discussion of artistic developments in the Gulf

I’m participating in a program called ‘Art of the Revolution’ in De Balie in Amsterdam, with a presentation of how social and cultural developments are behind the art that is emerging in the Gulf countries (with a focus on Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and Kuwait). My presentation will provide a counterpoint to the usual overview of how governments in the region are creating massive cultural districts with imported skills and talent, by examining the artists themselves within their context.
After my presentation there will be a discussion
See www.debalie.nl/art for more information about the program. Highlights are a performance by Tashweesh and a concert of Zeid and the Wings, later in the evening.

My presentation is on Saturday December 10 at 3 pm.
I will also present some works by the Syrian artist Mahmoud Dayoub (see my following post) in the Balie cafe

Ayman Yossri Daydban: I wanted peace but prepared for war (from his Subtitles series, 2009)

Categories: Uncategorized.

Exhibition of Mahmoud Dayoub in The Hague

I recently set up an exhibition in the headquarters of the Humanistic Institute for Development Cooperation (Hivos) in The Hague. The works are by the young Syrian artist Mahmoud Dayoub. Hivos headquarters are situated on the Raamweg 16 in The Hague and the exhibition can be seen every weekday during office hours (8am to 6pm) until 7 December 2011.

Mahmoud Dayoub, untitled; oil on canvas, 180 x 140 cm, 2011

Mahmoud Dayoub is a Syrian artist born in 1981 in Homs, Syria. He first studied painting at the Sobhi Shoaib Center in Homs, then graduated from the Faculty of Fine Arts in Damascus in 2005 – where he is currently enrolled in the Master programme.

The artist has had a solo show at the French Cultural Center in Damascus and has participated in a number of group shows in Syria, Tunisia and Iran. Since 2010 he has been represented by Galerie Beeld in Den Haag, who has brought his work to the attention of collectors in Belgium (Art Brussels) and the Netherlands (Affordable Art Fair in Amsterdam).

Mahmoud Dayoub is a very prolific artist, whose work reflects the energy of contemporary Syrian society. Syria was always one of the main centers of cultural production in the Arab world. Since the beginning of the 21st Century a true artistic boom has taken place, thanks to the first timid signs of reform and a generally favorable regional context.

The list of Syrian artists that have risen to international fame over the past decade is long. The first wave, carried by Syrian galleries with international ambitions is now being followed up by a young generation interested in social themes, new media and community art. Mahmoud Dayoub can be reckoned to this new generation – he has for example also experimented with video art.

Most of the works shown here have never been shown in Syria before. They express the state of existential anguish, frustration, confusion and powerlessness that a young Syrian can feel nowadays – without ever abandoning a sense of (dark) humor. The paintings on canvas and paper from 2011 have been complemented with a series of earlier works from 2007, based on the study of a woman pulling off her sweater over her head.

This exhibition has been set up with the generous support of Galerie Beeld (Anna Paulownastraat 87, Den Haag) and the artist himself. For more information please contact Robert Kluijver (the curator) at +31 614 777 828.

Mahmoud Dayoub, untitled, 2011. Acrylic paint on paper, 100 x 120 cm.

Mahmoud Dayoub, untitled, 2011. Acrylic paint on paper, 100 x 120 cm.

Categories: Uncategorized.

Tags: , ,

Attack on the Green Zone in Kabul

This unfinished building overlooking the US Embassy compound was probably used by the Taliban in the current attack.

In 2009, while visiting Kabul, I was astonished by the fortifications that had arisen around a large swathe of land comprising the US Embassy, NATO headquarters, the Presidential Palace, key ministries and other embassies. Given the hilly topography and urban layout of Kabul, this cordoning off of a large chunk of the centre caused considerable traffic and access problems for ordinary Kabulis.

I drove around the outside of what I termed the ‘Green Zone’ by analogy with Baghdad taking photographs of the fortifications. I used these photographs and a hand-drawn map of Kabul for my installation “Kabul Pavilion” at the Mediamatic Biennial in Amsterdam, 2009.

For the benefit of those following the news in Kabul today, here’s the map of the ‘Green Zone’ in Kabul where the attacks are taking place, and a couple of the photographs of the perimeter, as seen from outside.

For the security of the foreigners (in this case the ISAF/NATO headquarters compound) the sidewalks have been sacrificed, forcing Afghans to walk among the traffic

Categories: Uncategorized.

Radio-cursus hedendaagse kunst in het Midden-Oosten

This post is in Dutch because it concerns a Dutch-language radio programme I made about contemporary art in the Middle East, presented as a course in 4 chapters (one every evening)

Op verzoek van het VPRO programma ‘De Avonden’ heb ik vier avonden lang een ‘cursus’ gegeven over hedendaagse kunst in het Midden-Oosten. De uitleveringen werden van 28 juni t/m 1 juli uitgezonden.

Aflevering 1: algemene introductie
Aflevering 2: hedendaagse kunst in Saoedi Arabie
Aflevering 3: de verdwenen kunstenaars van Irak
Aflevering 4: kunst in Syrie en huidige toestand

Iedere aflevering begint tussen de 3 en 6 minuten na aanvang van het programma en duurt zo’n 10 minuten

Categories: Uncategorized.

The final chapter of the modernist dream

Why the art sector cannot justify its continued existence

The idea that societies could be reformed (modernized) through general access to culture, also high culture, was part of the modernist project for Western societies. These ideals were stated most forcefully in the 1920s and 30s by the avant-garde. They became mainstream in the post-war era, when the leaders of the Western world were looking for social-political models that could prevent the recurrence of the devastating world wars while avoiding a communist insurrection of the masses. The social democracy that was adopted in all Western countries as a response to the deficiencies of the old social order and the threat of communism incorporated many of the modernist ideals. Society had to advance rapidly and, as the history of the early 20th century had proven, artists played an important role in reconnoitering the future. In addition the general affluence of the social democratic West made support to artists feasible.
As a result artists came to work for the state, as they were to contribute to the general reform of society by breaking new ground and creating modern awareness among the general public. Almost the whole artistic sector came to depend on state subsidies, thereby weakening horizontal links (and solidarity) within the arts community. The Western social democratic state, in the spirit of Popper’s open society, was loathe to predetermine the outcomes of its support to artists, thereby letting all kinds of artistic practices flourish.
The more traditional patronage of art, whereby power supports arts as an ‘investment in symbolic capital’ – art as a kind of aristocratic wrapper for power – did not disappear completely during this period, but its foundations were shaken by the avant-garde assaults (particularly the Bolsheviks, but then again in the 1960s and 70s celebration of counterculture). Beautiful painting and sculpture, perfectly performed classical music, timeless theatre plays – the kind of ‘ennobling’ arts powerful patrons support – nearly disappeared in the second half of the Western 20th century.
The political-economic shift away from the social democratic model started in the late 1970s and the 1980s. As Soviet communism was perceived to be failing, the modernist project also lost its urgency. The rivalry with the Soviet Bloc that had encouraged social democratic policies, including in the field of arts, lost its sway over policy making. Thus the leaders of the Western world could resist the demands of their societies – for more welfare, more freedom, more equality – that became so powerful during the 1960s and 70s. These demands were curtailing the power of the elites. They responded through the gradual introduction of neoliberal policies. Simply put, the idea was to reduce the wealth flowing to society through the State in order to make citizens compete more for their share of wealth, thus breaking class solidarity, while allowing more concentration of wealth at the top, well out of reach of the public realm. This ‘liberated’ capital could be used to conquer new ‘markets’ and resist the challenge posed by emerging economies. The Western world is still, and increasingly, locked in this logic, as the immense transfer of public wealth to private capital that occurred during recent crises confirms.
Although the modernist project with its prominent role for artists was shelved with the proclamation of the ‘End of History’ and the inauguration of the ambiguous post-modernist phase, the ideal of the open society still remained, providing the logic to continued state support of artists. Artists, always challenging established truths and exploring the boundaries of our open society, were essential to the self-representation of Western liberal democracies. In the spirit of the times they were made to compete more and more for increasingly scarce public funding, but the principle that the State should support artists in order to retain some kind of creative edge and provide cultural prestige to itself (or the ‘nation’ it represented) was not really challenged.
The post-modern Western artist felt that it was still his role to break open new terrain, but the question why and for whom became impossible to answer in the absence of a collective project; as a result he retracted into his private world and his personal quest in art and avoided taking a stance in public debates. Thus he stopped responding to the expectations of his patron, the State.
The rapid accumulation of wealth in private hands allowed however for the reinstatement of the more traditional kind of patronage – the modern art with which a bank could impress its customers or an investor sway his relations. As a result the global art market boomed from the early 1990s onwards. However only the artists that played into the expectations of this market benefitted from this boom (the cute violinist or the orchestra with the famous conductor, the spectacular theatre company, the witty painter or the movie director that knows how to manipulate his audience in a pleasant manner). The other artists or artistic institutions, who for whatever reason would not engage this market, remained dependent on public funding.
Now the democratic process in the Netherlands, as in other Western countries, has come to question the rationale of continued public funding of the arts sector. This process has slowly gained speed. Initially pressure was applied on the dependent art sector to find funds from other sources: cultural entrepreneurship. Those artistic institutions that clearly confer symbolic capital to their supporters – the ‘red carpet’ sector, where the rich and famous are gladly seen and are honored to be on the board of directors – had less trouble in accessing private funds than the experimental art sector, which does not appeal to the powerful. This sector relied on downsizing, economies of scale (sharing programmes) and funding from other public sources. But now, in the Netherlands as elsewhere, the scarce public funding that they still received will be withdrawn. The question is whether this sector will survive.
The drama within this experimental art sector is complete, not least because its protagonists cannot formulate any meaningful answer to the question: “What do these arts (we) contribute to society?”. The answers they come up, mostly drawn from the ‘creative cities’ concept, are utterly unconvincing and ultimately self-defeating: ‘we contribute to a good investment climate’ (does China need artists?), ‘people who consume art also spend money on other consumption articles’ (but the experimental art events hardly draw a public), ‘artistic research has interesting spin-offs in other economic domains’ (examples please?). Really the artists that cannot please the rich and powerful cannot justify their own existence. Therefore this whole art sector, built up over decades, is incapable of putting up a fight as it is being slashed away. It cannot even organize negative resistance (like labor unions of disappearing industries) because artists, long used to compete for state funding, have lost the reflex of mutual solidarity, a basic prerequisite for collective action.
We are witnessing the end to the last remnants of the modernist dream. What makes this so poignant is not that this dream was so beautiful (it has rightly been much maligned) but that there is no other project for Western societies, no new horizon to which the arts could contribute.
As long as we (the artists) cannot formulate this new horizon, this project for the future of our societies, we will not be able to resist the neoliberal onslaught. The situation is hopeless because the whole concept of a collective project, immediately assimilated to totalitarian ideologies, has become suspect.

Categories: Art & Politics, Political thoughts.

Tags: , , , ,

Flying Dinner in Paris

Flying Dinner (c) in Restaurant Zelda, Paris

RobertK presentation of Middle Eastern art at Flying Dinner, Paris. Photo Lea Santamaria

The Flying Dinner team (curator and contemporary art specialist Samantha Barroero and art & wine-expert Linda Grabe) invited me to give a presentation of contemporary Middle Eastern art in Paris, for a select group of collectors, curators and other specialists that were brought together for a lovely Moroccan lunch. The event took place on March 19 2011, after I returned from the Sharjah Biennial and Art Dubai.
The idea behind the Flying Dinners is to present art in a novel, much more sensorial way. The invitee (in this case me) should only present real artworks (no powerpoints or handouts) and the wines and dishes are especially selected to fit the art selection.
In this case we drank lovely wines from North Africa and Syria while savouring a custom-made lunch in an otherwise empty restaurant, which was rearranged for the occasion.
I presented Evolution of Humanity (silkscreen prints) of the Saudi Arabian artist Ahmed Mater and the ‘Kandahar’ chair of the ‘Furniture for Belligerents’ line by Emeric Lhuisset and Amanullah Mojadidi. This chair was developed in Kabul for the always waiting belligerents, who hang around 95% of their time with their AK47s, without a place to sit. With a simple lightweight and easy-to-carry package two AK47s can be used to create a comfortable chair. The two pieces were perfectly suited for my performance-like presentation.

Ahmed Mater: Evolution of Man, silkscreen prints, 2010

Kandahar chair, by Lhuisset & Mojadidi


Besides, the French artist Renaud Layrac presented the world map painted with used motor oil that was made by the group BP.

World Map (US centred) by Groupe BP (oil stains on paper)

Not only did we have an absolute fantastic time, but according to the guests their eyes were truly opened towards the Middle Eastern art scene.
If you’re interested in hosting or otherwise organizing such a Flying Dinner please contact the Flying Dinner team, linda@flyingdinners.com & samantha@flyingdinners.com. Or get in touch with me!

Categories: Uncategorized.